<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for fauxbeatpoet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fauxbeatpoet.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fauxbeatpoet.com</link>
	<description>Pop Culture&#039;s Second-Tier Guru</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorkin and Reconciling Criticism with Fandom by j</title>
		<link>http://fauxbeatpoet.com/2012/06/25/sorkin-fandom-and-cultural-biases/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fauxbeatpoet.com/?p=20#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S78RzZr3IwI&amp;feature=youtu.be]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='538' height='333' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/S78RzZr3IwI?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sorkin and Reconciling Criticism with Fandom by SC</title>
		<link>http://fauxbeatpoet.com/2012/06/25/sorkin-fandom-and-cultural-biases/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fauxbeatpoet.com/?p=20#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting piece that -- for lack of a better phrase -- hit home for me: I&#039;m close in age to you; the way Sorkin&#039;s work has affected my life is very similar to the way in which you describe its affect on yours; and I also think that Sorkin&#039;s television work has fallen out of critical favor. Or maybe it&#039;s just that Sports Night and The West Wing have become improperly devalued.

Anyway, this comment doesn&#039;t have much purpose and doesn&#039;t add anything to your discussion. I just know how you feel, man. For me, though, even with the triumph of The Social Network (and to a lesser extent, Moneyball), nothing can alter the permanent revision my fandom underwent after Studio 60. Like you, I still want everything Sorkin does to be an unquestionable success. But the guy&#039;s fallible. Studio 60 taught me that. And as much as I might try to defend him, and defend the ways in which some of his work has been utterly brilliant, I can&#039;t deny that he appears to have an ego the size of Montana and has done some really shitty work. I thought the review by Linda Holmes articulated that beautifully.

I don&#039;t know. At least Sorkin keeps getting chances to go out there and see if there&#039;s anything left. It&#039;s better than slipping on a tangerine peel in the locker room.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting piece that &#8212; for lack of a better phrase &#8212; hit home for me: I&#8217;m close in age to you; the way Sorkin&#8217;s work has affected my life is very similar to the way in which you describe its affect on yours; and I also think that Sorkin&#8217;s television work has fallen out of critical favor. Or maybe it&#8217;s just that Sports Night and The West Wing have become improperly devalued.</p>
<p>Anyway, this comment doesn&#8217;t have much purpose and doesn&#8217;t add anything to your discussion. I just know how you feel, man. For me, though, even with the triumph of The Social Network (and to a lesser extent, Moneyball), nothing can alter the permanent revision my fandom underwent after Studio 60. Like you, I still want everything Sorkin does to be an unquestionable success. But the guy&#8217;s fallible. Studio 60 taught me that. And as much as I might try to defend him, and defend the ways in which some of his work has been utterly brilliant, I can&#8217;t deny that he appears to have an ego the size of Montana and has done some really shitty work. I thought the review by Linda Holmes articulated that beautifully.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. At least Sorkin keeps getting chances to go out there and see if there&#8217;s anything left. It&#8217;s better than slipping on a tangerine peel in the locker room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
